From: Richard Jones <rich@annexia.org>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: environment idiom
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 09:09:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041209090911.GA21478@annexia.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9410EC84C0872141B27A2726613EF45D02A52E08@psmrdcex01.psm.pin.safeco.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 548 bytes --]
Just an observation here:
The object method seems to be compile-time safe, whereas the hash
method seems to require run-time checks which could fail. Am I right
in thinking this? If so, the compile-time safe version is infinitely
preferable.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones. http://www.annexia.org/ http://www.j-london.com/
>>> http://www.team-notepad.com/ - collaboration tools for teams <<<
Merjis Ltd. http://www.merjis.com/ - improving website return on investment
http://execellence.co.uk/ - Interim and executive recruitment
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-09 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-09 2:07 HENRIKSON, JEFFREY
2004-12-09 4:47 ` [Caml-list] " Jacques Garrigue
2004-12-09 6:02 ` Michael Walter
2004-12-09 11:28 ` Jacques Garrigue
2004-12-09 20:02 ` pad
2004-12-09 23:11 ` Jacques Garrigue
2004-12-10 2:30 ` skaller
2004-12-09 9:09 ` Richard Jones [this message]
2004-12-09 13:12 ` [Caml-list] " Ville-Pertti Keinonen
2004-12-10 11:59 ` Richard Jones
2004-12-10 10:52 ` [Caml-list] " Andrej Bauer
2004-12-10 12:13 ` Richard Jones
2004-12-10 23:35 ` Jacques Garrigue
2004-12-11 2:30 ` skaller
2004-12-11 14:31 ` Andrej Bauer
2004-12-11 18:13 ` Markus Mottl
2004-12-11 23:56 ` skaller
2004-12-12 2:36 ` William Lovas
2004-12-12 5:33 ` skaller
2004-12-12 19:09 ` Michael Walter
2004-12-13 0:48 ` skaller
2004-12-13 2:03 ` Michael Walter
2004-12-13 2:05 ` Michael Walter
[not found] ` <877e9a170412121844b633bb8@mail.gmail.com>
2004-12-13 2:45 ` Michael Walter
2004-12-13 6:18 ` skaller
2004-12-13 7:08 ` skaller
2004-12-13 9:56 ` Michael Walter
2004-12-13 12:59 ` skaller
2004-12-13 8:56 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2004-12-13 9:21 ` Jacques Garrigue
2004-12-13 10:05 ` Michael Walter
2004-12-13 10:29 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2004-12-13 21:16 ` Michael Walter
2004-12-13 10:20 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2004-12-13 12:09 ` Jacques Garrigue
2004-12-13 12:48 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2004-12-13 14:09 ` skaller
2004-12-13 21:39 ` Michael Walter
2004-12-13 13:22 ` skaller
2004-12-13 16:54 ` Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
2004-12-13 18:44 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2004-12-13 10:11 ` Michael Walter
2004-12-13 11:46 ` skaller
2004-12-13 5:41 ` skaller
2004-12-13 9:29 ` Michael Walter
2004-12-13 12:30 ` skaller
2004-12-13 13:49 ` Martin Berger
2004-12-12 23:03 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2004-12-13 1:26 ` skaller
2004-12-13 8:37 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2004-12-13 10:53 ` skaller
2004-12-13 11:38 ` Martin Berger
2004-12-13 13:33 ` skaller
2004-12-13 12:01 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2004-12-13 13:41 ` skaller
2004-12-11 23:29 ` skaller
2004-12-12 0:21 ` Jacques Carette
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041209090911.GA21478@annexia.org \
--to=rich@annexia.org \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).