From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CCD8BB81 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 03:17:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from ptb-relay02.plus.net (ptb-relay02.plus.net [212.159.14.213]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iBD2HY2G017946 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 03:17:34 +0100 Received: from [80.229.56.224] (helo=chetara) by ptb-relay02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1CdfmH-000JzD-Lu for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 02:17:33 +0000 From: Jon Harrop To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] looking for benchmark suite Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 02:20:41 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <41BCF678.70205@compiler.kaist.ac.kr> In-Reply-To: <41BCF678.70205@compiler.kaist.ac.kr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="euc-kr" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200412130220.41625.jon@jdh30.plus.com> X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 41BCFBBE.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 wrote:01 cheers:01 ...:98 ...:98 benchmark:02 benchmark:02 although:08 monday:10 bit:10 bit:10 such:13 particularly:13 2004:79 well:22 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (2004-09-13) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.0 X-Spam-Level: On Monday 13 December 2004 01:55, SooHyoung Oh wrote: > ... > - 32bit system vs. 64bit system > ... I am particularly interested in this as well, although I know of no such benchmark results. Cheers, Jon.