caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr>
To: Luca Pascali <pasckosky2000@yahoo.it>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Mutex and posix
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:56:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050112155607.GB8652@yquem.inria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41E501B4.4060601@yahoo.it>

> Just a little question, my curiosity about the thread module.
> 
> I found in Posix (this is from 'info libc' page on section Mutexes) 
> these three functions
> 
> Function: int pthread_mutex_lock (pthread_mutex_t *mutex))
> Function: int pthread_mutex_trylock (pthread_mutex_t *MUTEX)
> Function: int pthread_mutex_timedlock (pthread_mutex_t *MUTEX, const 
> struct timespec *ABSTIME)

The latter is a recent addition to the POSIX threads API -- it's not
in the original POSIX threads spec (POSIX 1003.1c-1995).  I wouldn't
rely on this function being available in all POSIX threads
implementations.

> Polling continously is different. If I have two threads that are running 
> with scantimes one multiple of the other, it is possible that one of the 
> two threads (the slower one) fails always or almost always the try_lock 
> command.

It's hard to give useful suggestions without knowing more about your
application, but it could be the case that you're using mutexes to do
things they are not really designed for, i.e. plain mutual exclusion,
for which neither trylock nor timedlock are needed.

Maybe your application needs a more complex but better suited
synchronization mechanism, which can generally be built on top of
mutexes and conditions, or (at a higher semantic level) Concurrent
ML-style events.

- Xavier Leroy


  reply	other threads:[~2005-01-12 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-12 10:53 Luca Pascali
2005-01-12 15:56 ` Xavier Leroy [this message]
2005-01-12 17:29   ` [Caml-list] " Luca Pascali
2005-01-15 17:53     ` Alex Baretta
2005-01-15 17:49 ` Alex Baretta
2005-01-15 19:37   ` Brian Hurt
2005-01-17  8:52     ` Alex Baretta
2005-01-19  3:31       ` Brian Hurt
2005-01-19  9:34         ` Alex Baretta
2005-01-17 12:33   ` Luca Pascali

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050112155607.GB8652@yquem.inria.fr \
    --to=xavier.leroy@inria.fr \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=pasckosky2000@yahoo.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).