From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9864BC8C for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:27:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from first.in-berlin.de (dialin-145-254-063-108.arcor-ip.net [145.254.63.108]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j0PDRhNw017720 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:27:44 +0100 Received: by first.in-berlin.de (Postfix, from userid 501) id 0FA6CA3743; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:27:40 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:27:40 +0100 From: Oliver Bandel To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: local Open Message-ID: <20050125132740.GA321@first.in-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 41F6494F.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; oliver:01 bandel:01 oliver:01 in-berlin:01 ocaml:01 unpolluted:01 ...:98 modules:01 modules:01 namespace:06 versions:06 newer:09 ciao:10 idea:11 but:12 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (2004-09-13) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=disabled version=3.0.0 X-Spam-Level: Hello, is it planned to have a local Open-statement in OCaml in newer Versions? This would help a lot to easily write code with opened modules and at the same time to have unpolluted namespace. There are local modules... but not local Open's?! Any idea about that? Ciao, Oliver