From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA01CBC88 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 11:50:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with SMTP id j18AoNQT024693 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 11:50:23 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Feb 2005 10:50:23 -0000 Received: from p4523e3d4.np.schlund.de (EHLO schluck.use.schlund.de) (212.227.35.69) by mail.gmx.net (mp027) with SMTP; 08 Feb 2005 11:50:23 +0100 X-Authenticated: #20477425 From: Micha Reply-To: micha-1@fantasymail.de To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [Benchmark] NBody Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 11:52:12 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <68b7b7bf7d559600cf85b24d60f06cb2@mit.edu> <05666de9ff3face903514bf411230a8e@mit.edu> <20050208.113430.112623673.andrieu@ijm.jussieu.fr> In-Reply-To: <20050208.113430.112623673.andrieu@ijm.jussieu.fr> X-Techauftrag: 007 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502081152.12891.micha-1@fantasymail.de> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 4208996F.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 andrieu:01 wrote:01 compiler:01 hmmm:01 ocaml:01 compiler:01 ocaml:01 dienstag:98 benchmark:02 probably:05 olivier:07 michael:07 maybe:07 think:10 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: On Dienstag 08 Februar 2005 11:34, Olivier Andrieu wrote: > in that case, the -ffast-math compiler switch will probably make a > noticeable difference on x86 (but maybe that's cheating). hmmm? I think it's an ocaml program and not a c program? How can the -ffast-math compiler switch have any effect on ocaml code? Michael