From: Oliver Bandel <oliver@first.in-berlin.de>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Memory allocation nano-benchmark.
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:26:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050211112654.GB429@first.in-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <420BB3E3.1060005@t-online.de>
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 08:20:03PM +0100, Christian Szegedy wrote:
[...]
> Actually, I have *filled* the arrays, as it may be clear from
> the code. This example was extracted from a program which
> massively shuffles around the content of this 3-dimensional grid.
> (Both work fine and yield identical output.)
>
> To my astonishment, the OCaml was a bit faster than C when
> working on the grid, but the speed of allocation was nowhere
> near to that of the C version.
What does this mean?
Is only the work on the grid faster, or is the program
all in all (mem allocation AND working on the grid)
faster in OCaml or in C?
What does count more?
Being faster in subatsks, or getting the whole computation
done in a shorter time?
Ciao,
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-11 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-10 15:15 Christian Szegedy
2005-02-10 14:47 ` [Caml-list] " Frédéric Gava
2005-02-10 15:19 ` skaller
2005-02-10 16:36 ` Frédéric Gava
2005-02-10 17:56 ` Frédéric Gava
2005-02-10 19:56 ` Christian Szegedy
2005-02-10 23:58 ` Frédéric Gava
2005-02-11 9:22 ` Frédéric Gava
2005-02-11 13:04 ` skaller
2005-02-11 13:33 ` skaller
2005-02-11 21:07 ` Oliver Bandel
2005-02-12 0:44 ` skaller
2005-02-15 14:17 ` Frédéric Gava
2005-02-15 19:19 ` Christian Szegedy
2005-02-15 20:51 ` Jon Harrop
2005-02-16 8:19 ` Ville-Pertti Keinonen
2005-02-16 9:54 ` Jon Harrop
2005-02-16 10:56 ` Ville-Pertti Keinonen
2005-02-11 0:55 ` skaller
2005-02-10 14:56 ` Jon Harrop
2005-02-10 15:32 ` Ville-Pertti Keinonen
2005-02-10 14:59 ` John Prevost
2005-02-10 16:50 ` Marwan Burelle
2005-02-10 19:20 ` Christian Szegedy
2005-02-10 19:40 ` Jon Harrop
2005-02-11 11:26 ` Oliver Bandel [this message]
2005-02-12 13:42 ` Christian Szegedy
2005-02-11 1:04 ` skaller
2005-02-11 11:28 ` Oliver Bandel
2005-02-12 0:01 ` Guillaume
2005-02-12 0:36 ` skaller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050211112654.GB429@first.in-berlin.de \
--to=oliver@first.in-berlin.de \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).