From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB0DFBC8B for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 03:05:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j1E25FfN010955 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 03:05:15 +0100 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id DAA25791 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 03:05:15 +0100 (MET) Received: from nexus.stwing.upenn.edu (NEXUS.STWING.UPENN.EDU [165.123.132.61]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j1E25DwQ022004 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 03:05:14 +0100 Received: from force.stwing.upenn.edu (root@force.stwing.upenn.edu [165.123.132.65]) by nexus.stwing.upenn.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j1E25CJ6021745 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 21:05:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from force.stwing.upenn.edu (wlovas@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by force.stwing.upenn.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j1E25BuP011410 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 21:05:11 -0500 (EST) Received: (from wlovas@localhost) by force.stwing.upenn.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id j1E25BG6011409 for caml-list@inria.fr; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 21:05:11 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 21:05:10 -0500 From: William Lovas To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Determining memory usage? Message-ID: <20050214020510.GA10522@force.stwing.upenn.edu> Mail-Followup-To: caml-list@inria.fr References: <20050213132939.03ea86d1.ocaml-erikd@mega-nerd.com> <6b8a9142050213003195ddb28@mail.gmail.com> <20050214124650.69921c71.ocaml-erikd@mega-nerd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050214124650.69921c71.ocaml-erikd@mega-nerd.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 4210075B.002 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 42100759.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; lovas:01 wlovas:01 stwing:01 upenn:01 caml-list:01 wrote:01 heap:01 cheers:01 remi:01 seems:03 bytes:03 sys:03 erik:04 size:95 size:95 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 12:46:50PM +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Thanks Remi, the heap_words field of the stat record seems to be > what I want. However sicne that field is in words, I'm looking > for a way to figure out the word_size (4 vs 8 bytes) so I can > do a calculation that is correct on 32 and 64 but systems. > > Any further clues? How about the strikingly appropriately named Sys.word_size? :) cheers, William