From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012E4BC75 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:39:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j1I8d2RO008790 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:39:02 +0100 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA27940 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:39:02 +0100 (MET) Received: from first.in-berlin.de (dialin-145-254-054-073.arcor-ip.net [145.254.54.73]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j1I8cxw7008771 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:39:00 +0100 Received: by first.in-berlin.de (Postfix, from userid 501) id 57D3FAD58C; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 06:21:37 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 06:21:36 +0100 From: Oliver Bandel To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Camlp4 documentation (was: Immediate recursive functions) Message-ID: <20050218052136.GA425@first.in-berlin.de> References: <4214EDF1.7070109@t-online.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 4215A9A6.004 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 4215A9A3.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; oliver:01 bandel:01 oliver:01 in-berlin:01 caml-list:01 recursive:01 wrote:01 wrote:01 syntax:01 ocaml:01 ....:98 functions:01 jambon:02 tutorial:04 thu:05 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 02:39:12PM -0800, Martin Jambon wrote: > On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Christian Szegedy wrote: > > > Feel free to write your CamlP4 extension ;) > > :-) > But there are few things to know/discover before starting. > > Is anyone interested in a kind of highly practical tutorial on > how to extend the syntax of OCaml with Camlp4? absolutely, there is.... I neglected Camlp4 because of the uncomprehensible documentation on it. > I could possibly start writing one if there is enough demand. DEMAND! DEMAND! DEMAND! DEMAND! Regards, Oliver