From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BD77BC75 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:39:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j1I8d2mA008781 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:39:02 +0100 Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA28323 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:39:01 +0100 (MET) Received: from first.in-berlin.de (dialin-145-254-054-073.arcor-ip.net [145.254.54.73]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j1I8cxPF024436 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:39:00 +0100 Received: by first.in-berlin.de (Postfix, from userid 501) id 185EBAD5C1; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 06:29:11 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 06:29:11 +0100 From: Oliver Bandel To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Safe marshall? Message-ID: <20050218052911.GC425@first.in-berlin.de> References: <059442cb47f5e19bca230316a6ae6261@fas.harvard.edu> <21947.192.168.0.1.1108633144.squirrel@gps.dynxs.de> <9c3c426c52d70a19ad1dc3e3047a5138@csun.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9c3c426c52d70a19ad1dc3e3047a5138@csun.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 4215A9A6.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 4215A9A3.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; oliver:01 bandel:01 oliver:01 in-berlin:01 caml-list:01 wrote:01 gerd:01 compiler:01 asn:01 ocaml:01 seems:03 thu:05 attacker:05 feb:09 marshall:09 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 03:14:30PM -0800, Eric Stokes wrote: > I have to agree with Gerd, if at all possible use a protocol compiler > such as XDR, or ASN.1, even signing might not be secure if your Yes, XDR seems to be a good idea. > attacker can get ahold of the keys you are using. I can attest to the > robustness of Gerd's XDR implementation, I have used it in several > projects. Well.. is there already an XDR-binding for OCaml? Where to find it?! Ciao, Oliver