From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E593EBC32 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:09:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j2F89rFE016143 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:09:53 +0100 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA00007 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:09:53 +0100 (MET) Received: from first.in-berlin.de (dialin-145-254-054-018.arcor-ip.net [145.254.54.18]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j2F89qGh016140 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:09:52 +0100 Received: by first.in-berlin.de (Postfix, from userid 501) id A0F8BBBA4E; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:09:49 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:09:49 +0100 From: Oliver Bandel To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] immutable Strings? Message-ID: <20050315080949.GJ321@first.in-berlin.de> References: <423567E1.1030909@sophia.inria.fr> <20050314125728.GA17687@furbychan.cocan.org> <20050314130148.GA19240@furbychan.cocan.org> <20050315.111339.88500970.garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050315.111339.88500970.garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 42369851.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 42369850.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; oliver:01 bandel:01 oliver:01 in-berlin:01 caml-list:01 syntax:01 bug:01 ocaml:01 bug:01 ocaml:01 developpers:01 ...:98 ...:98 wrote:01 strings:01 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 11:13:39AM +0900, Jacques Garrigue wrote: [...] > > If you have a better idea for the syntax, register a wish with the bug > report system... It is possible to register wishes for Ocaml on the bug report system? So when I want to have an "immutable" keyword for strings, I can register that to the OCaml developpers? If so... where to do that? Ciao, Oliver