From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC389BC32 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:32:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j2F8WlGK019149 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:32:47 +0100 Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA00575 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:32:47 +0100 (MET) Received: from first.in-berlin.de (dialin-145-254-054-018.arcor-ip.net [145.254.54.18]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j2F8WjQj030198 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:32:46 +0100 Received: by first.in-berlin.de (Postfix, from userid 501) id BAF74BBAE4; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:32:43 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:32:43 +0100 From: Oliver Bandel To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml troll on Slashdot Message-ID: <20050315083243.GO321@first.in-berlin.de> References: <42363A86.6010309@1969.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42363A86.6010309@1969.ws> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 42369DAF.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 42369DAD.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; oliver:01 bandel:01 oliver:01 in-berlin:01 caml-list:01 ocaml:01 ocamlc:01 ocamlopt:01 ...:98 ...:98 wrote:01 sys:03 sys:03 discussion:08 cells:08 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 05:29:42PM -0800, Karl Zilles wrote: > http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/03/14/2258219 [...] Well, I used the code that is provided there. And it runs on my computer not 16 minutes... ===================== (...) 4 by 10 10 empty cells: XXOX OXXX XXXO XOXX XXXO OXXX XXOX OXXX XXXO XOXX real 0m10.677s user 0m9.440s sys 0m0.040s ===================== (with ocamlc) ===================== real 0m7.583s user 0m6.390s sys 0m0.020s (with ocamlopt) ===================== So the whole discussion is stiupid... Ciao, Oliver