From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 954CABC84 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 06:44:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j2S4iNcw009567 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 06:44:23 +0200 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA18674 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 06:44:22 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from smtp5.wanadoo.fr (smtp5.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.26]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j2S4iMKH009564 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 06:44:22 +0200 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0507.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 804D21C01625 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 06:44:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Galois (Mix-Strasbourg-209-3-160.w80-9.abo.wanadoo.fr [80.9.106.160]) by mwinf0507.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id A680A1C01623 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 06:44:21 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20050328044421682.A680A1C01623@mwinf0507.wanadoo.fr Received: from evariste by Galois with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DFm63-0000da-2v for caml-list@inria.fr; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 06:43:27 +0200 Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 06:43:27 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien?= Hinderer To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Should one use caml_ prefix in C code ? Message-ID: <20050328044327.GA2437@galois> Mail-Followup-To: caml-list@inria.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 42478BA7.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 42478BA6.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; ens-lyon:01 defines:01 stubs:01 stub:01 functions:01 macros:01 caml:02 caml:02 string:03 string:03 sebastien:05 sebastien:05 style:94 rather:07 seem:07 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: Dear all, Among Caml header files is one called compatibility.h. This file defines macros allowing one to use, say, copy_string rather than caml_copy_string when writing stub functions. But what is the recommended style for writing stubs ? Should the caml_ prefix be used, or not ? The documentation does not seem to mention anything about that. Thanks, Sébastien.