caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [Caml-list] Re: Still problems with the main ocaml web page
@ 2005-03-31 10:35 Martin Sandin
  2005-03-31 12:14 ` Maxence Guesdon
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Martin Sandin @ 2005-03-31 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: caml-list

I seem to have found that the page actually works fine
for me if I just access caml.inria.fr/index.en.html
instead of www.ocaml.org or caml.inria.fr. The
document I get from those two addresses looks like:
"""
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<!DOCTYPE page PUBLIC
   "-//CamlWebSite//DTD CamlWebSite pre-xhtml//EN"
   "http://caml.inria.fr/dtd/pre-xhtml.dtd">

<?xml-stylesheet
href="http://caml.inria.fr/xslt/html.xsl"
type="text/xsl"?>

<page name="home" 
  fr="yes" title-fr="Le langage Caml: Accueil"
  en="yes" title-en="The Caml language: Home"
>

  <options
    show-title="no"
    floats="no"
  />

  <navigation>

    more stuff here...
"""
It doesn't have a <html> tag at all and isn't
recognised by the copies of IE I'm using. I could
hazard a guess that the mentioned xslt document
probably should be applied, and that IE wasn't so hot
with doing client-side xslt-transformations when I
last read an article. But of these matters I
admittedly have limited knowledge.


Martin



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] Re: Still problems with the main ocaml web page
@ 2005-03-31 19:28 Martin Sandin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Martin Sandin @ 2005-03-31 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: caml-list

Everything now seems to work just fine. Congrats to a
much better web presence than previously! The
integration of the Humps is, among everything else, a
nice improvement. If future plans allow it I'd be
interested in having one of those nice little boxes on
the right with the latest Humps material as well as
the latest news. Makes the language seem more vibrant
when the first page has new stuff at tighter
intervals:)

And the concerns I expressed in my first post in this
thread turned out to be mostly unfounded and have now
all been put to rest. Thanks for straight answers, and
as always, fantastic work.


Martin



		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Messenger 
Show us what our next emoticon should look like. Join the fun. 
http://www.advision.webevents.yahoo.com/emoticontest


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Still problems with the main ocaml web page
@ 2005-03-30 14:19 Martin Sandin
  2005-03-30 15:01 ` [Caml-list] " Yaron Minsky
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Martin Sandin @ 2005-03-30 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: caml-list

Erik de Castro Lopo skrev:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 22:43:17 +1000
> Erik de Castro Lopo <ocaml-erikd@mega-nerd.com> 

<snip>

> which means that the server is OK and that the
problem must be in my
> browser.

Might be, might be. But it's a problem you share with
each of the 3 Internet Explorer copies (ie 3 windows
machines) I've tried to use to access the site. If the
problem is specific to me, please tell me and ignore
what I've written below.

The site works fine in Opera and Mozilla, and is a lot
nicer than the old, but it doesn't work in IE. The
fact that Windows isn't the no 1 priority of the OCaml
team, or the community, is both obvious (witness the
lack of 3.08.3 binaries for Windows) and
understandable. But I am still surprised that it was
even considered acceptable to release a site which
entierly excludes the 80+% majority browser (figure is
likely to be lower in the dev community, but no way
less than 50%). I always thought OCaml at least wanted
to grow, I sure do want it to, a popular language
brings many desirable advantages, and that a new site
would help in this regard (image is important, after
all). But while the new site looks (and more
importantly, works) better it can only be viewed by
those who already know to look for substance over
flash (gross generalization) and often prefer sparse
sites. The young and impressionable ones will miss it
entierly and the more market oriented ones will not be
interested in something which looks practically dead
(or completly oblivious to marketing, which is much
the same). In what way this situation is to be
considered an improvement in general, and for whom, I
don't know.

I know you are all overworked and not web design
people. I know promotion and popularity are fairly low
priority items, which is part of the reason you've
been able to bring us this extremly versatile
language. But the now practical lack of a real web
presence for OCaml denies the language, you, and us
all, to even have a shot. I really prefer not to
whine, and this post came out a whole lot more
negative than I wished, but I want to use OCaml a lot
more in the future. Thanks.


Martin









__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-03-31 19:28 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-03-31 10:35 [Caml-list] Re: Still problems with the main ocaml web page Martin Sandin
2005-03-31 12:14 ` Maxence Guesdon
2005-03-31 18:58   ` Eijiro Sumii
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-03-31 19:28 Martin Sandin
2005-03-30 14:19 Martin Sandin
2005-03-30 15:01 ` [Caml-list] " Yaron Minsky
2005-03-30 15:11 ` Christopher Campbell
2005-03-30 15:29 ` Xavier Leroy
2005-03-30 19:24   ` Dimitri Timofeev
2005-03-30 23:48     ` Marc Herbert
2005-03-30 20:30   ` Eijiro Sumii

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).