From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 439A1BC48 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:16:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ptb-relay03.plus.net (ptb-relay03.plus.net [212.159.14.214]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j2VCG1kY010468 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:16:02 +0200 Received: from [80.229.56.224] (helo=chetara) by ptb-relay03.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1DGyab-000GnS-N5 for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 12:15:57 +0000 From: Jon Harrop Organization: Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] When is a function polymorphic? Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:16:38 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <891bd339050330165142478f37@mail.gmail.com> <891bd33905033020045cad3ce2@mail.gmail.com> <20050331.173223.128566586.garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <20050331.173223.128566586.garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200503311316.39240.jon@ffconsultancy.com> X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 424BEA01.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 constructors:01 cheers:01 wrote:01 polymorphic:01 jacques:01 garrigue:03 explicit:03 function:08 difficult:12 but:12 thursday:15 there:17 when:21 2005:77 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: On Thursday 31 March 2005 09:32, Jacques Garrigue wrote: > Is it so difficult to make the extra constructors explicit? But there are _n_ of them! ;-) Cheers, Jon.