From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59C27BC48 for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 23:52:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j32LqLNt009084 for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 23:52:21 +0200 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA13009 for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 23:52:21 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from furbychan.cocan.org (furbychan.cocan.org [80.68.91.176]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j32LqIAc027030 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 23:52:21 +0200 Received: from rich by furbychan.cocan.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1DHqXF-0004ix-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 22:52:05 +0100 Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 22:52:05 +0100 To: Robert Roessler Cc: Caml-list Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Website: My posts aren't archived??? Message-ID: <20050402215204.GA18128@furbychan.cocan.org> References: <20050402155408.GA12147@furbychan.cocan.org> <424F08AE.7060006@rftp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <424F08AE.7060006@rftp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Richard Jones X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 424F1415.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 424F1412.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 posts:01 posts:01 threads:01 notepad:01 ...:98 conspiracy:98 wrote:01 functions:01 mutt:01 thread:02 thread:02 caml:02 guess:02 perhaps:03 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 01:03:42PM -0800, Robert Roessler wrote: > Indeed, all of your posts to *that thread* are "redacted"... but > magically, people responding to you were able to quote you. :) > > Not knowing how the automated machinery of the Caml list actually > functions, I could hazard a guess - were your posts to the thread in > question perhaps formatted as something other than plain text and/or > for some other reason appeared as attachments? This is sort of what I thought. I also thought that perhaps my posts contains an [X-]No-Archive header. Although I don't have the original messages --- they are sitting on the hard drive of a computer with a zapped motherboard at the moment --- I'm fairly certain that neither is the case. I use mutt, and I don't add any fancy headers. > If there actually was a conspiracy involved here, it was somewhat > localized - random checks of other "richard jones" threads seem to all > be present and accounted for. :) Well, odd :-) Rich. -- Richard Jones, CTO Merjis Ltd. Merjis - web marketing and technology - http://merjis.com Team Notepad - intranets and extranets for business - http://team-notepad.com