From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 989DEBC48 for ; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 23:36:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from swip.net (mailfe06.swip.net [212.247.154.161]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j3ALaZrL020688 for ; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 23:36:35 +0200 X-T2-Posting-ID: 2IIuXFmkcTpj3lKEFKW25A== Received: from [83.176.173.218] (HELO poincare) by mailfe06.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.9) with ESMTP id 328853274; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 23:36:33 +0200 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost ident=trch) by poincare with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DKgsH-0005qd-AB; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 20:09:33 +0200 Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 20:09:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <20050410.200933.123076737.debian00@tiscali.be> To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Raising an old issue : true concurrency in OCaml [Xavier, Damien, any] From: Christophe TROESTLER In-Reply-To: <20050407214731.E31541C00085@mwinf1201.wanadoo.fr> References: <20050407214731.E31541C00085@mwinf1201.wanadoo.fr> Organization: Universite de Mons-Hainaut (http://math.umh.ac.be/an/) X-Spook: Baranyi IDEA enemy of the state SDI SP4 Jiang Zemin Firefly Sears Tower Mena interception X-Blessing: Om Ah Hum Vajra Guru Pema Siddhi Hum X-Operating-System: GNU/Linux (http://www.linux.org/) X-Mailer-URL: http://www.mew.org/ X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 42599C63.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 ocaml:01 damien:01 christophe:01 troestler:01 compiler:01 wrote:01 debian:02 concurrency:02 concurrent:02 concurrent:02 latter:03 chris:05 thu:05 xavier:06 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, "Yoann Fabre" wrote: > > Phase 3 - write a concurrent GC (CGC) (re-ouch!) It is conceivable to have two GC, the one as of now and a concurrent one and select the latter with an option of the compiler (say -smp), or are the two GC requirements too different for that? ChriS