From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3867BC48 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:43:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j3E8ho2d020422 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:43:50 +0200 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA10915 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:43:50 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from tintin.inria.fr (tintin.inria.fr [128.93.24.126]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j3E8hnBO020418; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:43:49 +0200 Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:43:49 +0200 From: Maxence Guesdon To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Website: My posts aren't archived??? Message-ID: <20050414104349.4f4b157e@tintin.inria.fr> In-Reply-To: <20050402155408.GA12147@furbychan.cocan.org> References: <20050402155408.GA12147@furbychan.cocan.org> Organization: INRIA X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.1 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 425E2D46.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 425E2D45.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; maxence:01 guesdon:01 maxence:01 guesdon:01 caml-list:01 posts:01 posts:01 caml-list:01 conspiracy:98 ...:98 wrote:01 caml:02 hack:03 pointing:04 problem:05 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: On Sat, 2 Apr 2005 16:54:08 +0100 Richard Jones wrote: > None of my posts are archived. For example: > > http://caml.inria.fr/pub/ml-archives/caml-list/2004/12/44d75066acdec03c1bced756a0a4d533.en.html > > Some conspiracy?!? Hello, the tool we use to create pages from messages did not look in parts of multiparts messages. PGP-signed message are multipart messages. A small hack was added to handle the case of multipart messages with a part having a "application/pgp-signature..." content-type. It should be ok, now. Thanks for pointing the problem. Regards, -- Maxence Guesdon