From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22AEBBC84 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 21:19:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j3JJJ2Mp025561 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 21:19:02 +0200 Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA24962 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 21:19:02 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from swip.net (mailfe09.swip.net [212.247.155.1]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j3JJJ1iM015260 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 21:19:02 +0200 X-T2-Posting-ID: 2IIuXFmkcTpj3lKEFKW25A== Received: from [83.176.170.147] (HELO poincare) by mailfe09.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.9) with ESMTP id 135462156; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 21:18:58 +0200 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost ident=trch) by poincare with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DNyFM-00027C-4P; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 21:18:56 +0200 Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 21:18:27 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <20050419.211827.39232766.debian00@tiscali.be> To: "O'Caml Mailing List" Subject: Re: [Caml-list] CamlGI question [doh] From: Christophe TROESTLER In-Reply-To: References: <42652387.4030006@fas.harvard.edu> <1113933973.6248.76.camel@localhost.localdomain> Organization: Universite de Mons-Hainaut (http://math.umh.ac.be/an/) X-Spook: credit card INSCOM Cohiba Kosovo SSL AGT. AMME cybercash covert video advisors rail gun X-Blessing: Om Ah Hum Vajra Guru Pema Siddhi Hum X-Operating-System: GNU/Linux (http://www.linux.org/) X-Mailer-URL: http://www.mew.org/ X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 426559A6.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 426559A5.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 christophe:01 troestler:01 stdout:01 stdout:01 buffer:01 mandates:01 stderr:01 ...:98 ...:98 wrote:01 essentially:01 data:02 debian:02 latter:03 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Eric Stokes wrote: > > printing stuff to stdout should not cause a problem, because stdout > is a listening socket, the data would essentially go into a buffer > which will never be read. On many FastCGI implementations it indeed shouldn't be a problem but that may if they respect the spec. Indeed the latter mandates that stdout and stderr be closed (http://www.fastcgi.com/devkit/doc/fcgi-spec.html#S2.2). > [...] problem may actually be single_write vs. write. [...] and get > back to you. Get back to us all. I am also interested whether this is indeed the problem. Regards, ChriS