From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FA63BC84 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 15:23:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j3KDNguT010386 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 15:23:42 +0200 Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA15257 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 15:23:41 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from lea.cs.unibo.it (lea.cs.unibo.it [130.136.1.101]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j3KDNfTa010383 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 15:23:41 +0200 Received: from fistandantilus.takhisis.org (n32d144.cs.unibo.it [130.136.32.144]) by lea.cs.unibo.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21A548B45E for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 15:23:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: by fistandantilus.takhisis.org (Postfix, from userid 3148) id 1029F274061; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 15:23:35 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 15:23:34 +0200 From: Stefano Zacchiroli To: Inria Ocaml Mailing List Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Common XML interface (was: Common CGI interface) Message-ID: <20050420132332.GA10928@fistandantilus.takhisis.org> Mail-Followup-To: Inria Ocaml Mailing List References: <810e04dc0f6bb601fb828db8d18def6c@fas.harvard.edu> <20050419.133304.40952590.debian00@tiscali.be> <20050419084526.Q20372@bowser.eecs.harvard.edu> <20050419.210334.63756712.debian00@tiscali.be> <1113940495.6248.101.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4266032F.5030307@inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4266032F.5030307@inria.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 426657DE.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 426657DD.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; zacchiroli:01 caml-list:01 frisch:01 event-driven:01 event-driven:01 zacchiroli:01 unibo:01 ...:98 zack:01 zack:01 wrote:01 debian:02 tree:02 tree:02 alain:03 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 09:22:23AM +0200, Alain Frisch wrote: > It would be great to have some common interface. An event-driven > interface is probably easier to agree upon. There are many points to Even if certainly easier to agree upon, event-driven interface for XML are harder to program than tree based ones. Basic tree operations should not be that hard to agree upon ... -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!-