caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: michel@lami.univ-evry.fr (Olivier Michel)
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Cc: the MGS project <mgs@lami.univ-evry.fr>
Subject: Changes on equality between 3.06 and 3.08.3
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 12:02:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050428100252.GF31263@lami.univ-evry.fr> (raw)

Hi dear ocamlers,

I just noticed the following change in Ocaml between release 3.06 and 3.08.3, as far
as equality on records is concerned :


////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
//
//release 3.06
//

dellfp-3 7 > /ocaml
        Objective Caml version 3.06

# type toto = { b : int -> int; } ;;
type toto = { b : int -> int; }
# let a = { b = (fun x -> x) } ;;
val a : toto = {b = <fun>}
# a = a;;
- : bool = true


//
//release 3.08.3
//


dellfp-3 8 > ocaml
        Objective Caml version 3.08.3

# type toto = { b : int -> int; };;
type toto = { b : int -> int; }
# let a = { b = (fun x -> x) } ;;
val a : toto = {b = <fun>}
# a = a;;
Exception: Invalid_argument "equal: functional value".

////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Is this supposed to be a bug, or a feature ? Will future releases of Ocaml follow
the new way of handling equality between records or the old one ?

Best regards,
Olivier.

--
Olivier MICHEL                       Email : michel@lami.univ-evry.fr
Universite d'Evry Val d'Essonne      http  : www.lami.univ-evry.fr/~michel
Equipe Specif / Projet MGS           http  : mgs.lami.univ-evry.fr
LaMI - UMR 8042 du CNRS              Phone : +33 (0)1.60.87.39.10
523, place des terrasses de l'agora  Fax   : +33 (0)1.60.87.37.89
91000 Evry - FRANCE


             reply	other threads:[~2005-04-28 10:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-28 10:02 Olivier Michel [this message]
2005-04-28 16:29 ` [Caml-list] " Damien Doligez
2005-04-28 16:41 ` Alex Baretta
2005-04-28 17:06   ` Olivier Andrieu
2005-04-28 18:20     ` Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
2005-04-28 18:23     ` Jon Harrop

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050428100252.GF31263@lami.univ-evry.fr \
    --to=michel@lami.univ-evry.fr \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=mgs@lami.univ-evry.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).