From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B30B7BCAF for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:35:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j5A6ZAM6018354 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:35:10 +0200 Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA31982 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:35:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ms003msg.fastwebnet.it (ms003msg.fastwebnet.it [213.140.2.42]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j5A6Z9mB018351 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:35:09 +0200 Received: from fistandantilus.takhisis.org (37.10.140.105) by ms003msg.fastwebnet.it (7.2.059.7) id 42A58B7D000BD3CD for caml-list@inria.fr; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:35:09 +0200 Received: by fistandantilus.takhisis.org (Postfix, from userid 3148) id CCD7C274096; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:35:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:35:06 +0200 From: Stefano Zacchiroli To: Inria Ocaml Mailing List Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Caml on intel-OSX Message-ID: <20050610063505.GB30637@fistandantilus.takhisis.org> Mail-Followup-To: Inria Ocaml Mailing List References: <1118295206.7145.165.camel@rosella.wigram> <0908894eeba2802d8441ea3476c67c36@wetware.com> <1118330851.8693.10.camel@rosella.wigram> <36973.131.254.50.45.1118334009.squirrel@mail.irisa.fr> <1118357500.8693.80.camel@rosella.wigram> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1118357500.8693.80.camel@rosella.wigram> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 42A9349E.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 42A9349D.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; zacchiroli:01 caml-list:01 compiler:01 invokes:01 makefile:01 packager:01 makefile:01 compilation:01 cheers:01 zacchiroli:01 unibo:01 zack:01 zack:01 wrote:01 invoke:01 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 08:51:40AM +1000, John Skaller wrote: > (and it's a real pain for the Debian packaging .. since > the system autodetects the native code compiler and tries > to use it even though it doesn't work: there is no > opportunity to intervene manually in Debian autobuilds) This is not true. Debian autobuilds simply invoke a make file (debian/rules) written by the package, which usually invokes upstream Makefile. Since you are the packager, if you really want the autobuilds not to build native code, then you can change either debian/rules or Makefile so that native code compilation is not enforced. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!-