From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AC92BCAF for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 18:32:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ux9.sp.cs.cmu.edu (UX9.SP.CS.CMU.EDU [128.2.220.166]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with SMTP id j5TGWL7B028901 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 18:32:21 +0200 Received: from c-24-3-154-200.hsd1.pa.comcast.net ([24.3.154.200]) by ux9.sp.cs.cmu.edu id aa01339; 29 Jun 2005 12:30 EDT Received: from ecc by stratocaster.home with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DnfSZ-0004S8-7c for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 12:30:47 -0400 Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 12:30:47 -0400 To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ARM or MIPS? Message-ID: <20050629163047.GA17099@localhost> Mail-Followup-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr References: <42C25813.86FD43FF@philips.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42C25813.86FD43FF@philips.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Eric Cooper X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 42C2CD15.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 mips:01 ocaml:01 asmcomp:01 hacked:01 ocaml:01 extensively:01 byte-code:01 native-code:01 wrote:01 usable:01 ported:03 standard:07 wed:07 edu:07 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 10:13:07AM +0200, Leszek.Holenderski@philips.com wrote: > Has OCaml been ported to ARM? If so, is the port really usable? Yes, it's part of the standard distribution (see asmcomp/arm). I hacked it into a cross-compiler a while ago so I could run OCaml programs on a Sharp Zaurus. I haven't used it extensively, but both byte-code and native-code programs worked fine. -- Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u