From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 549F3BDE9 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 13:18:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from copper.three-tuns.net (copper.three-tuns.net [193.201.200.235]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j7UBIWHV029163 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 13:18:33 +0200 Received: from mark by copper.three-tuns.net with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EA48N-0002eX-Lb; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 12:18:31 +0100 Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 12:18:31 +0100 From: Mark Shinwell To: Christophe Raffalli Cc: Jon Harrop , caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: GUI for OCaml Message-ID: <20050830111831.GD5470@three-tuns.net> References: <4311DA63.4010104@havenrock.com> <200508292333.59714.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <3d13dcfc050830001671d0974f@mail.gmail.com> <43142CB2.8030306@univ-savoie.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43142CB2.8030306@univ-savoie.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: Mark Shinwell X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 43144088.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; shinwell:01 shinwell:01 caml-list:01 ocaml:01 christophe:01 raffalli:01 kde:01 kde:01 wxwindows:01 ...:98 grapevine:98 wrote:01 gui:04 interface:05 i'd:05 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 11:53:54AM +0200, Christophe Raffalli wrote: > Why a modern look, you should have the look of the OS you are running > on, using the OS X look on OS X, the windows look on windows, the KDE > (with the user skin) look on KDE etc ... Personally I'd love to see an up-to-date interface to wxWindows, which provides all of the above, but from what I hear on the grapevine previous attempts at such a layer have been frought with difficulties. Mark