From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6DA1BC6A for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:51:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ptb-relay01.plus.net (ptb-relay01.plus.net [212.159.14.212]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j8D0pGeE028292 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:51:16 +0200 Received: from [80.229.56.224] (helo=chetara) by ptb-relay01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1EEz10-00082r-CU for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:51:14 +0100 From: Jon Harrop Organization: Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Compiling to OCaml bytecode Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:48:00 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200509090622.58156.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <626610B4-6781-4FE9-B1A9-A8B37CB5391A@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <626610B4-6781-4FE9-B1A9-A8B37CB5391A@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200509130148.01174.jon@ffconsultancy.com> X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 43262284.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 ocaml:01 bytecode:01 oops:01 metaocaml:01 metaocaml:01 ocaml:01 cmo:01 dynlink:01 ...:98 frog:98 wrote:01 data:02 caml:02 caml:02 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 On Friday 09 September 2005 16:01, Paul Snively wrote: > Hi Jon! > > First: I love the book. :-) Thank you! :-) > Sounds like to me, or maybe even www.metaocaml.org>. I believe the former has been dead for some time. MetaOCaml is still alive and kicking though. I studied it in some detail but somehow managed to forget about it now... > > Does the OCaml distribution expose everything needed to do this? > > No. Damn. A ".cmo" is just a marshalled data structure though, right? So could I spit those out and then dynlink them back in? > I really do think either Dynamic Caml or MetaOCaml will be what you > want. I'll have a play with MetaOCaml. > "What happens when you try it?" ;-) I'll keep you posted. :-) -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. Objective CAML for Scientists http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists