From: Oliver Bandel <oliver@first.in-berlin.de>
To: caml-list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: ocamlyacc and names of rules
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 23:56:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050914215617.GA558@first.in-berlin.de> (raw)
Hello,
I have used the name "object" for a grammar rule in ocamlyacc.
This produced parse errors with OCaml 3.08.0 - is this a known
bug?
Or is it "correct" bahaviour, because it's an OCaml identifier ("object")?
I thought the grammar rules can be named indepenently of the
OCaml's reserved words.
Didn't tried rules named "let" or something...
...should be also impossible?!
Ciao,
Oliver Bandel
--
The Laban Scale Document-Generator:
http://me.in-berlin.de/~first/labscalgen-invoke.cgi
reply other threads:[~2005-09-15 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050914215617.GA558@first.in-berlin.de \
--to=oliver@first.in-berlin.de \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).