caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Chabr <martin_chabr@yahoo.de>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Avoiding shared data
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 23:32:02 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050925213202.32862.qmail@web26805.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> (raw)

Working with non-shared data structures in OCaml
Deep copy of OCaml structures, marshaling
================================================

Dear group members,

I need to process arrays of pairs of integers and
records ((int * record) array) in which all elements
must be updated individually, which means that
unshared data structures must be used. For arrays of
arrays I can produce unshared data by using the
library functions Array.copy and Array.append to
append the individual arrays into the embedding array.
It works, the low level arrays can be updated
individually. But I cannot use the same scheme to the
array of the (int * record) structures, because I do
not know how to copy these structures to dissolve the
sharing. I do not even know how to copy records. It
seems to me that this problem occurs always when I
want to produce an array of data with a fixed
structure automatically (rather than entering the
array [| ... |] by hand at the top level interpreter
using constants only). How can I produce completely
unshared structures?

What about marshaling and unmarshaling the data? This
should produce a deep copy of data objects. I have
tried it, it works, but it seems to me wasteful to
copy all the data twice only to get rid of the
sharing.

It would be great to know of a completely general (any
nested structures) and fast solution (without copying)
how to produce unshared data structures.

My environment is OCaml 3.08.02 for Windows on Win
2000, New Windows Interface v1.9RC4.

I am looking forward to you reply.

Regards,

Martin

Martin Chabr
Hochstrasse 28
8044 Zürich
Schweiz / Switzerland
Tel.P.: 01-261 17 24


		
___________________________________________________________ 
Was denken Sie über E-Mail? Wir hören auf Ihre Meinung: http://surveylink.yahoo.com/wix/p0379378.aspx


             reply	other threads:[~2005-09-25 21:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-25 21:32 Martin Chabr [this message]
2005-09-26  0:23 ` [Caml-list] " Bill Wood
2005-09-26  7:57 ` Claudio Sacerdoti Coen
2005-09-26  8:17 ` William Lovas
2005-09-26 21:07   ` Ant: " Martin Chabr
2005-09-26 22:08     ` Jon Harrop
2005-09-30 22:57     ` Oliver Bandel
2005-10-01  0:07       ` Pal-Kristian Engstad
2005-10-01  5:46         ` Bill Wood
2005-10-01  8:27         ` Wolfgang Lux
2005-10-01 18:02           ` Wolfgang Lux
2005-10-01 21:50           ` Ant: " Martin Chabr
2005-10-01 12:34         ` Oliver Bandel
2005-10-01 13:58           ` Bill Wood
2005-10-01 21:05         ` Ant: " Martin Chabr
2005-10-03  0:41           ` skaller
2005-10-03  1:13             ` Seth J. Fogarty
2005-10-03 13:09             ` Thomas Fischbacher
2005-10-03 14:57               ` skaller
2005-10-03 20:03               ` Ant: " Martin Chabr
2005-10-03 20:25                 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2005-10-03 21:08                 ` Jon Harrop
2005-10-04 18:06                   ` Ant: " Martin Chabr
2005-10-04 18:32                     ` Jon Harrop
2005-10-04  2:53                 ` skaller
2005-10-04 16:15                   ` Brian Hurt
2005-10-04 16:47                     ` FP/IP and performance (in general) and Patterns... (Re: [Caml-list] Avoiding shared data) Oliver Bandel
2005-10-04 22:38                       ` Michael Wohlwend
2005-10-05  0:31                         ` Jon Harrop
2005-10-04 22:39                       ` Christopher A. Watford
2005-10-04 23:14                         ` Jon Harrop
2005-10-05 12:10                         ` Oliver Bandel
2005-10-05 13:08                           ` Jon Harrop
2005-10-05 15:28                           ` skaller
2005-10-05 20:52                           ` Ant: " Martin Chabr
2005-10-05 23:21                             ` Markus Mottl
2005-10-06 16:54                               ` brogoff
2005-10-05  0:45                       ` Brian Hurt
2005-10-04 18:09                   ` Ant: Re: Ant: Re: Ant: Re: Ant: Re: [Caml-list] Avoiding shared data Martin Chabr
2005-10-05  8:42                     ` skaller
2005-10-05 11:14               ` Andrej Bauer
2005-10-01 21:36       ` Ant: Re: Ant: " Martin Chabr
2005-10-03 11:51         ` getting used to FP-programming (Re: Ant: Re: Ant: Re: [Caml-list] Avoiding shared data) Oliver Bandel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050925213202.32862.qmail@web26805.mail.ukl.yahoo.com \
    --to=martin_chabr@yahoo.de \
    --cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).