caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Bandel <oliver@first.in-berlin.de>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: FP/IP and performance (in general) and Patterns...  (Re: [Caml-list] Avoiding shared data)
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 18:47:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051004164700.GA494@first.in-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0510041111500.9226@localhost.localdomain>

Hello,


is there a general overvie (paper or book), where
functional and imperative approaches to solve a problem are
compared directly?

Most often people say, imperative is faster in most of all
cases, and only in some cases FP might be faster.

If there is a paper/book about problem solving and performance,
comparing different approaches I would be happy to have a pointer
to it.

Also it would be nice to find something about how
classical imperative style, OO-style and FP-style
are solving problems, and which patterns can be done
easier in the one or the other way.

I recently had a discussion about some OO-patterns
( so called "GoF"-Book) and tried to solve some of them with
OCamls module system.
Adapter and bridge was talked about. Adapter was easy in writing a simple
wrapper.
Bridge could be done with a functor. :)


So, if there are direct translations possible, where to find
comparisons?

Another interesting theme in this respect is: If not only some patterns
were adapted to Fp, but the whole problem solving approach is different,
which patterns will be unnevcessary then, because the whole structure of
the software will be different...?!



Ciao,
   Oliver



  reply	other threads:[~2005-10-04 22:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-25 21:32 Avoiding shared data Martin Chabr
2005-09-26  0:23 ` [Caml-list] " Bill Wood
2005-09-26  7:57 ` Claudio Sacerdoti Coen
2005-09-26  8:17 ` William Lovas
2005-09-26 21:07   ` Ant: " Martin Chabr
2005-09-26 22:08     ` Jon Harrop
2005-09-30 22:57     ` Oliver Bandel
2005-10-01  0:07       ` Pal-Kristian Engstad
2005-10-01  5:46         ` Bill Wood
2005-10-01  8:27         ` Wolfgang Lux
2005-10-01 18:02           ` Wolfgang Lux
2005-10-01 21:50           ` Ant: " Martin Chabr
2005-10-01 12:34         ` Oliver Bandel
2005-10-01 13:58           ` Bill Wood
2005-10-01 21:05         ` Ant: " Martin Chabr
2005-10-03  0:41           ` skaller
2005-10-03  1:13             ` Seth J. Fogarty
2005-10-03 13:09             ` Thomas Fischbacher
2005-10-03 14:57               ` skaller
2005-10-03 20:03               ` Ant: " Martin Chabr
2005-10-03 20:25                 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2005-10-03 21:08                 ` Jon Harrop
2005-10-04 18:06                   ` Ant: " Martin Chabr
2005-10-04 18:32                     ` Jon Harrop
2005-10-04  2:53                 ` skaller
2005-10-04 16:15                   ` Brian Hurt
2005-10-04 16:47                     ` Oliver Bandel [this message]
2005-10-04 22:38                       ` FP/IP and performance (in general) and Patterns... (Re: [Caml-list] Avoiding shared data) Michael Wohlwend
2005-10-05  0:31                         ` Jon Harrop
2005-10-04 22:39                       ` Christopher A. Watford
2005-10-04 23:14                         ` Jon Harrop
2005-10-05 12:10                         ` Oliver Bandel
2005-10-05 13:08                           ` Jon Harrop
2005-10-05 15:28                           ` skaller
2005-10-05 20:52                           ` Ant: " Martin Chabr
2005-10-05 23:21                             ` Markus Mottl
2005-10-06 16:54                               ` brogoff
2005-10-05  0:45                       ` Brian Hurt
2005-10-04 18:09                   ` Ant: Re: Ant: Re: Ant: Re: Ant: Re: [Caml-list] Avoiding shared data Martin Chabr
2005-10-05  8:42                     ` skaller
2005-10-05 11:14               ` Andrej Bauer
2005-10-01 21:36       ` Ant: Re: Ant: " Martin Chabr
2005-10-03 11:51         ` getting used to FP-programming (Re: Ant: Re: Ant: Re: [Caml-list] Avoiding shared data) Oliver Bandel
2005-10-05 13:45 FP/IP and performance (in general) and Patterns... (Re: " Oliver Bandel
2005-10-05 23:20 ` William Lovas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051004164700.GA494@first.in-berlin.de \
    --to=oliver@first.in-berlin.de \
    --cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).