caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Bandel <oliver@first.in-berlin.de>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: FP/IP and performance (in general) and Patterns... (Re: [Caml-list] Avoiding shared data)
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 14:10:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051005121028.GA757@first.in-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8008871f0510041539r1d2b242fifcd09cf32ba394fa@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 06:39:28PM -0400, Christopher A. Watford wrote:
[...] 
> This list is best for asking OCaml questions and is awful for asking
> for what language is best for what, nobody agrees.
[...] 


I was not asking, what language is better for soimething, or best at all.
I asked for what programming style/paradigm is best used to solve
certain problems.

As OCaml provides more than one programming paradigm, for me
it's the best language I ever had programmed in (some
other features are also fine).

So the question goes in a different direction:
  How to solve problems best, if you have the possibility
  do do it in different ways.

Well, every programmer can choose it's own way, but if certain areas
are well known to do them in a certain way best, it  makes sense
to go that direction.

For example, I'm not really a fan of OO-programming, but when
programming GUI-software I think it would be the best choice,
and FP-programming lacks flexibility here (if not using
a DSL to create GUI-code, which then is separately compiled).

Ciao,
   Oliver


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-10-05 12:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-25 21:32 Avoiding shared data Martin Chabr
2005-09-26  0:23 ` [Caml-list] " Bill Wood
2005-09-26  7:57 ` Claudio Sacerdoti Coen
2005-09-26  8:17 ` William Lovas
2005-09-26 21:07   ` Ant: " Martin Chabr
2005-09-26 22:08     ` Jon Harrop
2005-09-30 22:57     ` Oliver Bandel
2005-10-01  0:07       ` Pal-Kristian Engstad
2005-10-01  5:46         ` Bill Wood
2005-10-01  8:27         ` Wolfgang Lux
2005-10-01 18:02           ` Wolfgang Lux
2005-10-01 21:50           ` Ant: " Martin Chabr
2005-10-01 12:34         ` Oliver Bandel
2005-10-01 13:58           ` Bill Wood
2005-10-01 21:05         ` Ant: " Martin Chabr
2005-10-03  0:41           ` skaller
2005-10-03  1:13             ` Seth J. Fogarty
2005-10-03 13:09             ` Thomas Fischbacher
2005-10-03 14:57               ` skaller
2005-10-03 20:03               ` Ant: " Martin Chabr
2005-10-03 20:25                 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2005-10-03 21:08                 ` Jon Harrop
2005-10-04 18:06                   ` Ant: " Martin Chabr
2005-10-04 18:32                     ` Jon Harrop
2005-10-04  2:53                 ` skaller
2005-10-04 16:15                   ` Brian Hurt
2005-10-04 16:47                     ` FP/IP and performance (in general) and Patterns... (Re: [Caml-list] Avoiding shared data) Oliver Bandel
2005-10-04 22:38                       ` Michael Wohlwend
2005-10-05  0:31                         ` Jon Harrop
2005-10-04 22:39                       ` Christopher A. Watford
2005-10-04 23:14                         ` Jon Harrop
2005-10-05 12:10                         ` Oliver Bandel [this message]
2005-10-05 13:08                           ` Jon Harrop
2005-10-05 15:28                           ` skaller
2005-10-05 20:52                           ` Ant: " Martin Chabr
2005-10-05 23:21                             ` Markus Mottl
2005-10-06 16:54                               ` brogoff
2005-10-05  0:45                       ` Brian Hurt
2005-10-04 18:09                   ` Ant: Re: Ant: Re: Ant: Re: Ant: Re: [Caml-list] Avoiding shared data Martin Chabr
2005-10-05  8:42                     ` skaller
2005-10-05 11:14               ` Andrej Bauer
2005-10-01 21:36       ` Ant: Re: Ant: " Martin Chabr
2005-10-03 11:51         ` getting used to FP-programming (Re: Ant: Re: Ant: Re: [Caml-list] Avoiding shared data) Oliver Bandel
2005-10-05 13:45 FP/IP and performance (in general) and Patterns... (Re: " Oliver Bandel
2005-10-05 23:20 ` William Lovas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051005121028.GA757@first.in-berlin.de \
    --to=oliver@first.in-berlin.de \
    --cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).