From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <micha-1@fantasymail.de>
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE396BB81
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 22:57:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20])
	by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with SMTP id j9NKvThK032654
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 22:57:29 +0200
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 23 Oct 2005 20:57:29 -0000
Received: from p54A30DFD.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.2.136]) [84.163.13.253]
  by mail.gmx.net (mp034) with SMTP; 23 Oct 2005 22:57:29 +0200
X-Authenticated: #20477425
From: Michael Wohlwend <micha-1@fantasymail.de>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Ocamllex question
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 22:58:34 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.8
References: <435BD045.1000305@gushee.net>
In-Reply-To: <435BD045.1000305@gushee.net>
X-Face: S)[vu%Bha1d&ej9GfwAq~7C}A,y[B.uS}+D6'hb~xPwsxymw$fnCOaMe<=?utf-8?q?*bnUajSBR=5Fm=3FR=0A=09?=@V3;iX8[A}z`.%pEQ1r7iZhN8#ktTCBQ}&mkx>=RH&l|l6\]NZI@
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200510232258.34761.micha-1@fantasymail.de>
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 435BF939.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)!
X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 ocamllex:01 lexbuf:01 lexbuf:01 ...:98 ...:98 wrote:01 dict:01 dict:01 parse:02 parse:02 problem:05 sep:05 sep:05 quite:06 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_FAIL autolearn=disabled 
	version=3.0.3

Hi,

On Sunday 23 October 2005 20:02, Matt Gushee wrote:
>
>   and comment = parse
>       [ ^ '\n' ]                        { comment lexbuf }
>
>     | '\n'                              { SEP; dict lexbuf }

I'm not quite sure whether I understood your problem, but... doesn' it help to 
just return a SEP after a comment:

rule dict = parse
 ...
 | ',' | '\n'   { SEP }
 | '#' [^ '\n']* '\n'  { SEP }
 ...


 Michael