From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84351D460 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:05:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.24]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jA6I5gnJ004344 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:05:43 +0100 Received: (qmail 16074 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2005 18:05:41 -0000 Received: from dialup-4.242.36.161.dial1.seattle1.level3.net (HELO sherlock.localdomain) (shawnw@[4.242.36.161]) (envelope-sender ) by mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 6 Nov 2005 18:05:40 -0000 Received: by sherlock.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 502) id E30BF108B6; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 10:04:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 10:04:15 -0800 From: Shawn Wagner To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] strftime/strptime and asctime Message-ID: <20051106180415.GA559@speakeasy.org> Mail-Followup-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 436E45F6.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; shawnw:01 caml-list:01 shawnw:01 wrote:01 maintainers:01 functions:01 speakeasy:01 speakeasy:01 codebase:96 library:03 library:03 probably:05 standard:07 2005:91 patch:08 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.9 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 07:30:47PM -0500, Joshua Smith wrote: > This has come up on the list before (even by me once), but > I'm was wondering if anyone (like the maintainers) would have any > interest in a patch to the 3.09 codebase to add strptime, strftime and > asctime? It would probably work in the 3.08 code, too, but I figure > the most current version is the place to start. All three of these functions are already in the annex library (http://raevnos.pennmush.org/code/annexlib/), not that it wouldn't be nice to have them in the standard library too. -- Shawn Wagner shawnw@speakeasy.org