From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EB6CBB9C for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 21:42:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jAHKgdvr004862 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 21:42:39 +0100 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA27373 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 21:42:39 +0100 (MET) Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de (einhorn.in-berlin.de [192.109.42.8]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jAHKgcxd013292 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 21:42:39 +0100 X-Envelope-From: oliver@first.in-berlin.de X-Envelope-To: Received: from first.in-berlin.de (e178009010.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.178.9.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-4) with ESMTP id jAHKgat4016927 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 21:42:36 +0100 Received: by first.in-berlin.de (Postfix, from userid 501) id 56830193C44; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 21:41:58 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 21:41:58 +0100 From: Oliver Bandel To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [1/2 OT] Indexing (and mergeable Index-algorithms) Message-ID: <20051117204157.GA477@first.in-berlin.de> References: <20051116234238.GA5741@first.in-berlin.de> <437CD0E5.8080503@yahoo.fr> <20051117200213.GC344@first.in-berlin.de> <437CE8EC.1070109@yahoo.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <437CE8EC.1070109@yahoo.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang_at_IN-Berlin_e.V. on 192.109.42.8 X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 437CEB3F.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 437CEB3E.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; oliver:01 bandel:01 oliver:01 in-berlin:01 caml-list:01 indexing:01 bandel:01 wrote:01 ecrit:04 entries:05 entries:05 problem:05 docs:05 thu:05 depend:07 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 09:32:44PM +0100, sejourne_kevin wrote: > Oliver Bandel a écrit : > >If updates are cheap, then thats the right thing. > About 1Go an Hour, not depend of the number of docs. what is "1Go"? The update/addition of 10^5 entries in 10^6 entries must be ready in about 20 minutes (maximum; faster is better). Creating the first/main index can be hours, that's not the problem, but updates must be fast. Ciao, Oliver