caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jacques Garrigue <garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp>
To: Thomas.Fischbacher@Physik.Uni-Muenchen.DE
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] C interface style question
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:39:55 +0900 (JST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060119.093955.97297811.garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0601181925300.8013@guffert.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de>

From: Thomas Fischbacher <Thomas.Fischbacher@Physik.Uni-Muenchen.DE>

> value-type parameters to C functions exported to OCaml should be 
> registered with CAMLparamX(...). Does this hold in general, or is it 
> considered acceptable/appropriate to just ignore this for "immediate" 
> values that do not hold pointers, but, say, int, bool etc. values?

Registration is required to have the GC properly update the values.
The GC may be called by any allocation.
So it is only safe not to register a parameter (or a variable) in any
of the following 4 cases.
1) you know that it can only hold a non-pointer value (int, bool, ...)
   (i.e. the GC has nothing to update)
2) there are no allocations in your function
3) the parameter is not accessed after the first allocation
4) for a new variable whose contents is returned, there is no
   allocation between the setting of the variable and return.

(1) and (2) are relatively easy to see, but (3) and (4) are a bit
trickier (particularly with side-effecting expressions), so
it is not a bad idea to register more parameters than strictly
necessary.

Jacques


  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-01-19  0:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-18 18:28 Thomas Fischbacher
2006-01-18 19:18 ` [Caml-list] " Gerd Stolpmann
2006-01-18 20:32   ` Florent Monnier
2006-01-18 21:31     ` Gerd Stolpmann
2006-01-18 23:21       ` Florent Monnier
2006-01-18 23:43         ` Robert Roessler
2006-01-19  0:39 ` Jacques Garrigue [this message]
2006-01-19  3:17   ` skaller
2006-01-19 14:09     ` Damien Doligez
2006-01-19 14:17       ` Thomas Fischbacher
2006-01-19 14:24       ` Thomas Fischbacher
2006-01-19 14:52         ` Olivier Andrieu
2006-01-20 10:49           ` Damien Doligez
2006-02-12 20:40             ` Olivier Andrieu
2006-02-13  9:45               ` Damien Doligez
2006-01-19 15:15       ` Thomas Fischbacher
2006-01-30 13:12       ` On Store_field() Thomas Fischbacher
2006-01-30 14:05         ` [Caml-list] " Olivier Andrieu
2006-01-19 12:13   ` [Caml-list] C interface style question Thomas Fischbacher
2006-01-19 13:49     ` Jacques Garrigue

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060119.093955.97297811.garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp \
    --to=garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp \
    --cc=Thomas.Fischbacher@Physik.Uni-Muenchen.DE \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).