From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28E22BBBB for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2006 19:47:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.5]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k0SIlsUJ027517 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2006 19:47:56 +0100 Received: (qmail 4522 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2006 18:47:53 -0000 Received: from dialup-4.242.102.240.dial1.seattle1.level3.net (HELO sherlock.localdomain) (shawnw@[4.242.102.240]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 28 Jan 2006 18:47:53 -0000 Received: by sherlock.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 502) id 04F5A110CC; Sat, 28 Jan 2006 10:54:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 10:54:04 -0800 From: Shawn Wagner To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: fungetc() equivalent? Message-ID: <20060128185404.GC24212@speakeasy.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 43DBBC5A.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; shawnw:01 pervasives:01 char:01 shawnw:01 short:01 speakeasy:01 speakeasy:01 streams:08 equivalent:08 c's:09 wrapper:11 wagner:11 wagner:11 writing:11 same:16 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.9 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 Is there any way to get the same effect as C's fungetc() with the Pervasives streams short of writing a wrapper for input_char and doing it the hard way? -- Shawn Wagner shawnw@speakeasy.org