From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E93D3BBBB for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:56:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from mxintern.schlund.de (mxintern.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.201]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k1SFuuf5009766 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:56:56 +0100 Received: from [172.17.36.11] (helo=schluck.use.schlund.de) by mxintern.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1FE7Db-0007Fn-5W for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:56:55 +0100 From: Michael Wohlwend To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] xml tree -- variant type tree Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:57:39 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <17412.27387.963123.675231@ithif59.inf.tu-dresden.de> <20060228154708.GA9583@furbychan.cocan.org> In-Reply-To: <20060228154708.GA9583@furbychan.cocan.org> X-Face: S)[vu%Bha1d&ej9GfwAq~7C}A,y[B.uS}+D6'hb~xPwsxymw$fnCOaMe<=?utf-8?q?*bnUajSBR=5Fm=3FR=0A=09?=@V3;iX8[A}z`.%pEQ1r7iZhN8#ktTCBQ}&mkx>=RH&l|l6\]NZI@ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602281657.39518.micha-1@fantasymail.de> X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 440472C8.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 cduce:01 parser:01 cduce:01 wrote:01 wrote:01 variant:02 tree:02 tree:02 quite:06 possibility:07 michael:08 michael:08 might:10 point:11 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO,SPF_FAIL autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 On Tuesday 28 February 2006 16:47, Richard Jones wrote: > CDuce is a possibility. It is tremendously powerful, and also quite > obscure to go along with it, but I wrote a nice SOAP/WSDL/XSI parser > using it. CDuce is a miracle for me. I tried it for hours and never had the feeling I unstood how it worked or why some code worked and some other not :-) At some point I thought it would be easier to code in brainf*ck than in cduce, but that might not be right :-) Michael