From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58CB4BBBB for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:11:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with SMTP id k1SIBHHe023392 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:11:18 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2006 18:11:17 -0000 Received: from p54A343B8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.2.136]) [84.163.67.184] by mail.gmx.net (mp029) with SMTP; 28 Feb 2006 19:11:17 +0100 X-Authenticated: #20477425 From: Michael Wohlwend To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] xml tree -- variant type tree Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:11:20 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <17412.27387.963123.675231@ithif59.inf.tu-dresden.de> <200602281657.39518.micha-1@fantasymail.de> <44047948.9070808@inria.fr> In-Reply-To: <44047948.9070808@inria.fr> X-Face: S)[vu%Bha1d&ej9GfwAq~7C}A,y[B.uS}+D6'hb~xPwsxymw$fnCOaMe<=?utf-8?q?*bnUajSBR=5Fm=3FR=0A=09?=@V3;iX8[A}z`.%pEQ1r7iZhN8#ktTCBQ}&mkx>=RH&l|l6\]NZI@ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602281911.20087.micha-1@fantasymail.de> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 44049245.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 frisch:01 cduce:01 syntax:01 parser:01 wrote:01 wrote:01 patterns:02 variant:02 tree:02 tree:02 alain:03 tutorial:04 tutorial:04 long:05 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_FAIL autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 On Tuesday 28 February 2006 17:24, Alain Frisch wrote: > Michael Wohlwend wrote: > Have the hours you spent been long enough to look at the resources to > learn the language (manual, tutorial, demos, other people's code)? yes, I read the tutorial and parts of the manual and tried the examples. I only tried it the whole day since I found the features very impressive. > They might not be perfect, but they certainly were ok for some people. I'm sure cduce works, it's just I could not get my task done in the time I thought it must be possible; I had difficulties with the syntax and the construction of the patterns. As the xml processing was only a minimal part I wrote the parser myself. Michael