From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E0AABB81 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 22:21:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with SMTP id k26LL105013456 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 22:21:02 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 06 Mar 2006 21:20:59 -0000 Received: from p54A304D7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.2.136]) [84.163.4.215] by mail.gmx.net (mp023) with SMTP; 06 Mar 2006 22:20:59 +0100 X-Authenticated: #20477425 From: Michael Wohlwend To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] recursive or loop Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 22:22:49 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200603061715.k26HF32w015203@nez-perce.inria.fr> <200603061925.35321.micha-1@fantasymail.de> <20060306192526.GA29897@fork.recoil.org> In-Reply-To: <20060306192526.GA29897@fork.recoil.org> X-Face: S)[vu%Bha1d&ej9GfwAq~7C}A,y[B.uS}+D6'hb~xPwsxymw$fnCOaMe<=?utf-8?q?*bnUajSBR=5Fm=3FR=0A=09?=@V3;iX8[A}z`.%pEQ1r7iZhN8#ktTCBQ}&mkx>=RH&l|l6\]NZI@ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200603062222.49613.micha-1@fantasymail.de> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 440CA7BD.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; recursive:01 anil:01 recursive:01 ocaml:01 2006:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 imperative:01 finer:07 styles:08 michael:08 michael:08 life:90 question:11 version:12 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO,SPF_FAIL autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 On Monday 06 March 2006 20:25, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: > > To answer your original question, I wouldn't get too religious about > recursive vs imperative styles; OCaml lets you choose and mix them, > so pick the one that gets the job done for you and move on to the > finer things in life :-) yop, that's true; it's just that in my case the recursive version is pretty nice :-) thanks, Michael