From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41EB7BB84 for ; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 01:15:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k3MNFHYr002346 for ; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 01:15:17 +0200 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA28698 for ; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 01:15:16 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from smtp2.syd.swiftdsl.com.au (smtp2.syd.swiftdsl.com.au [218.214.225.98]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with SMTP id k3MNFCid026724 for ; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 01:15:14 +0200 Received: (qmail 28331 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2006 23:15:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO coltrane.mega-nerd.net) (218.214.64.136) by smtp2.syd.swiftdsl.com.au with SMTP; 22 Apr 2006 23:15:10 -0000 Received: from coltrane (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by coltrane.mega-nerd.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C81E7B7C for ; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 09:15:07 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 09:15:06 +1000 From: Erik de Castro Lopo To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] What's "advantage of gcc-specific features"? Message-Id: <20060423091506.2ceaf9c5.ocaml-erikd@mega-nerd.com> In-Reply-To: <200604221614.k3MGE7O3007983@psi-phi.mit.edu> References: <87wtdivt4z.fsf@linux-france.org> <200604221614.k3MGE7O3007983@psi-phi.mit.edu> Organization: Erik Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.16; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 444AB905.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 444AB900.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; gcc-specific:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 unix:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 maintainers:01 erik:04 erik:04 sparc:08 sparc:08 john:08 machine:08 carr:08 bit:10 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 John Carr wrote: > The OCaml maintainers do not have a 64 bit SPARC system to test > on and can not take over my port. People who own 64 bit SPARC systems and want to see the SPARC port continued should contact SUN and suggest that SUN supply a machine for the Ocaml developers. Erik -- +-----------------------------------------------------------+ Erik de Castro Lopo +-----------------------------------------------------------+ "Unix, is novice hostile... Windows, is expert hostile." -- BCS on digitalmars.D