From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14940BB83 for ; Mon, 1 May 2006 01:28:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k3UNSJI6024141 for ; Mon, 1 May 2006 01:28:19 +0200 Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA05668 for ; Mon, 1 May 2006 01:28:18 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pih-relay05.plus.net (pih-relay05.plus.net [212.159.14.132]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k3UNSHtr028535 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 1 May 2006 01:28:18 +0200 Received: from [80.229.56.224] (helo=chetara) by pih-relay05.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1FaLKr-00051y-HS for caml-list@inria.fr; Mon, 01 May 2006 00:28:17 +0100 From: Jon Harrop Organization: Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Performance on PPC Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 00:29:20 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200604290029.20792.jon@ffconsultancy.com> X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 44554813.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 44554811.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 compares:01 ocaml:01 frog:98 caml:02 objective:02 i'd:05 macs:06 benchmarks:07 equivalent:09 ltd:86 products:86 done:14 www:85 U4:83 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_24_48 autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 Has anyone done any OCaml benchmarks on x86/AMD64 and PPC? I'd like to know how PPC compares specifically on OCaml programs. I assume Intel-based Macs are equivalent to Intel-based PCs. -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. Objective CAML for Scientists http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists