From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 746E7BB84 for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 08:23:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k4J6NxqZ027462 for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 08:23:59 +0200 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA16033 for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 08:23:58 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de (einhorn.in-berlin.de [192.109.42.8]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k4J6NvUs027457 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 08:23:58 +0200 X-Envelope-From: oliver@first.in-berlin.de X-Envelope-To: Received: from first.in-berlin.de (e178025247.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.178.25.247]) (authenticated bits=0) by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with ESMTP id k4J6Ntg4010106 for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 08:23:55 +0200 Received: by first.in-berlin.de (Postfix, from userid 501) id 5EAE2286D6D; Fri, 19 May 2006 08:24:04 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 08:24:04 +0200 From: Oliver Bandel To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] RAW-sockets Message-ID: <20060519062403.GF393@first.in-berlin.de> References: <20060518152745.GA6163@first.in-berlin.de> <20060519061241.GC393@first.in-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang_at_IN-Berlin_e.V. on 192.109.42.8 X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 446D647F.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 446D647D.003 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; bandel:01 in-berlin:01 ocaml:01 icmp:01 ocaml:01 garbage:01 2006:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 oliver:01 oliver:01 seems:03 generated:05 fri:05 manual:06 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 06:16:12PM +1200, Jonathan Roewen wrote: > >But I don't know HOW OCaml handle's the IP-stuff. > > > >I don't know if - when using protocoll 1 (ICMP) for example, > >if the IP-header will be generated automatically by OCaml. > >It seems that it will be handled this way, but I have not seen > >anything about this in the reference manual. > > > >Do I have to write the IP-header by myself or not? > > Best way to find out: make your packet and send it and see what > happens :-) Ethereal is most valuable in determining if your packets > are well crafted :) Sometimes just doing it is easiest way to know or > not ;-) I can try sending my network garbage to the windows-PCs in this network here ;-) Are their reactions also valuable in determining what my ip-packets look like? ;-) Ciao, Oliver