From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30F3BBB84 for ; Sun, 9 Jul 2006 15:59:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pih-relay04.plus.net (pih-relay04.plus.net [212.159.14.131]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k69DxfbW018822 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 9 Jul 2006 15:59:52 +0200 Received: from [80.229.56.224] (helo=chetara) by pih-relay04.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1FzZoz-0003KH-26 for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Sun, 09 Jul 2006 14:59:41 +0100 From: Jon Harrop Organization: Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Arrays and boxed/unboxed data Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 14:59:40 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <20060706102721.c8ace71e.ocaml-erikd@mega-nerd.com> <20060706135408.GA19446@localhost> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200607091459.40889.jon@ffconsultancy.com> X-Spam: no; 0.00; arrays:01 unboxed:01 unboxed:01 ocaml:01 2006:98 frog:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 functions:01 data:02 caml:02 objective:02 transform:04 max:05 elements:06 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 On Saturday 08 July 2006 16:25, Tom wrote: > You could probably use one dimensional array and use a modified getter and > setter functions that would transform 2-D indeces into 1-D indeeces. In > this way, all the elements would be unboxed. Although you're likely to hit the max array length limit on 32-bit. -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. Objective CAML for Scientists http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists