From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C94ABB83 for ; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 21:57:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6JJvs3k018637 for ; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 21:57:54 +0200 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA20224 for ; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 21:57:54 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from furbychan.cocan.org (furbychan.cocan.org [80.68.91.176]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6JJvpUP011107 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 21:57:53 +0200 Received: from rich by furbychan.cocan.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1G3IAy-0007y0-00; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 20:57:44 +0100 Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 20:57:44 +0100 To: Daniel =?iso-8859-1?Q?B=FCnzli?= Cc: list caml-list Subject: Re: On language extensions (was Re: [Caml-list] global record) Message-ID: <20060719195744.GA27347@furbychan.cocan.org> References: <67EBB7A9-9294-4783-BF44-E29651EA6E5F@epfl.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <67EBB7A9-9294-4783-BF44-E29651EA6E5F@epfl.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Richard Jones X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 44BE8EC2.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 44BE8EBF.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; bunzli:01 camlp:01 camlp:01 notepad:01 2006:98 wrote:01 arbitrary:01 caml-list:01 compile:01 daniel:04 jul:04 extension:05 marketing:93 probably:06 wed:07 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 09:41:46PM +0200, Daniel Bünzli wrote: > And by the way, are we guaranteed that two arbitrary camlp4 > extensions will compose or may the order of application matter ? I'm probably wrong, but I think the only way to compose two camlp4 extensions is to combine the source code to both together and compile a new extension. Is there some other way? Rich. -- Richard Jones, CTO Merjis Ltd. Merjis - web marketing and technology - http://merjis.com Team Notepad - intranets and extranets for business - http://team-notepad.com