From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE1FBBB83 for ; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 14:44:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6TCir9a002496 for ; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 14:44:53 +0200 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA10569 for ; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 14:44:52 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de (einhorn.in-berlin.de [192.109.42.8]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6TCijF8002456 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 14:44:52 +0200 X-Envelope-From: oliver@first.in-berlin.de X-Envelope-To: Received: from first.in-berlin.de (e178007224.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.178.7.224]) (authenticated bits=0) by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with ESMTP id k6TCiYZj005614 for ; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 14:44:35 +0200 Received: by first.in-berlin.de (Postfix, from userid 501) id 00B442EFF37; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 14:44:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 14:44:55 +0200 From: Oliver Bandel To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] To Dissect a Mockingbird Message-ID: <20060729124455.GA7509@first.in-berlin.de> References: <20060728111520.GS701@first.in-berlin.de> <9C312333-30AB-4683-A3A9-8D54FEB438B8@iais.fraunhofer.de> <20060728144009.GB4250@first.in-berlin.de> <8B7E03E8-7C44-49C3-91EF-AC5E4EEFEB39@iais.fraunhofer.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8B7E03E8-7C44-49C3-91EF-AC5E4EEFEB39@iais.fraunhofer.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang_at_IN-Berlin_e.V. on 192.109.42.8 X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 44CB5845.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 44CB583D.002 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; bandel:01 in-berlin:01 semantics:01 compares:01 bandel:01 2006:98 researched:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 oliver:01 oliver:01 programming:03 languages:03 jul:04 somewhat:05 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 01:50:30PM +0200, Dr. Axel Poign wrote: [...] > >Only for that reasons? > > > > > Maybe, I should reread but essentiially, yes, at least from the > perspective of semantics of programming languages. In philosophical > terms it somewhat compares to Frege's work, which is another good > reading. [...] Louis H. Kauffman, a mathematician/topologist is working on LoF and has researched a lot on that topic. He sent me this link: http://www.math.uic.edu/~kauffman/Laws.pdf Ciao, Oliver Bandel