caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Martin S. Weber" <Ephaeton@gmx.net>
To: Oliver Bandel <oliver@first.in-berlin.de>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCamlon 64 Bit-Sun compiled as 32-Bit
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 21:55:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060916195545.GB6039@circe.entropie.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060916185514.GA6087@first.in-berlin.de>

Moin Oliver,

On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 08:55:14PM +0200, Oliver Bandel wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> in the project I'm working, I have todo Perl-Programming.
> But in a free minute I compiled OCaml on the workstation.
> The compilation was without problems, it seems.
> 
> But the ocaml-distri (3.09.2) compiled as 32-Bit.
> I asked the admin, and he said, it's a 64-Bit workstation.
> 

This doesn't mean the compiler is set to generate 64bit objects
by default, iirc the solaris 8 boxes I worked on ran 64 bit on 
64 bit and nevertheless compiled stuff as 32bit. (yay).

See if you can pass a CPPFLAGS=-m64 to your compiler (gcc option,
if you're using sunpro pass the appropriate flag to the compiler
to enable/force 64bit compiling)...

I.e. no ocaml bug.

Maybe have a look at (gcc: gcc -dumpspecs which should among many
other things also tell you the default build/compile options...
E.g. on my sparc64, gcc tells me ...

*cpp_arch:
%{m32:%(cpp_arch32)} %{m64:%(cpp_arch64)} %{!m32:%{!m64:%(cpp_arch_default)}} 

(read as: passed m32? select cpp_arch32. passed m64? select cpp_arch64.
passed neither m32 nor m64 ? select cpp_arch_default.)

..and..

*cpp_arch32:


*cpp_arch64:
-D__arch64__

*cpp_arch_default:
-D__arch64__


)

Regards,

-Martin 


  reply	other threads:[~2006-09-16 19:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-16 18:55 Oliver Bandel
2006-09-16 19:55 ` Martin S. Weber [this message]
2006-09-16 20:00   ` [Caml-list] " Oliver Bandel
2006-09-16 20:59     ` Martin S. Weber
2006-09-16 22:55 ` John Carr
2006-09-17  0:55   ` Shawn W

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060916195545.GB6039@circe.entropie.net \
    --to=ephaeton@gmx.net \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=oliver@first.in-berlin.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).