From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60353BC50 for ; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 22:00:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de (einhorn.in-berlin.de [192.109.42.8]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8GK0gCb003221 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 22:00:43 +0200 X-Envelope-From: oliver@first.in-berlin.de X-Envelope-To: Received: from first.in-berlin.de (e178013231.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.178.13.231]) (authenticated bits=0) by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with ESMTP id k8GK0eMN024821 for ; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 22:00:40 +0200 Received: by first.in-berlin.de (Postfix, from userid 501) id C177E3155A9; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 22:00:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 22:00:56 +0200 From: Oliver Bandel To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCamlon 64 Bit-Sun compiled as 32-Bit Message-ID: <20060916200056.GA6205@first.in-berlin.de> References: <20060916185514.GA6087@first.in-berlin.de> <20060916195545.GB6039@circe.entropie.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060916195545.GB6039@circe.entropie.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang_at_IN-Berlin_e.V. on 192.109.42.8 X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 450C57EA.002 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; bandel:01 in-berlin:01 bandel:01 ocaml:01 compilation:01 compiler:01 iirc:01 compiler:01 gcc:01 flags:01 ocaml:01 bug:01 gcc:01 cpp:01 cpp:01 On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 09:55:45PM +0200, Martin S. Weber wrote: > Moin Oliver, > > On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 08:55:14PM +0200, Oliver Bandel wrote: > > Hello, > > > > in the project I'm working, I have todo Perl-Programming. > > But in a free minute I compiled OCaml on the workstation. > > The compilation was without problems, it seems. > > > > But the ocaml-distri (3.09.2) compiled as 32-Bit. > > I asked the admin, and he said, it's a 64-Bit workstation. > > > > This doesn't mean the compiler is set to generate 64bit objects > by default, iirc the solaris 8 boxes I worked on ran 64 bit on > 64 bit and nevertheless compiled stuff as 32bit. (yay). > > See if you can pass a CPPFLAGS=-m64 to your compiler (gcc option, > if you're using sunpro pass the appropriate flag to the compiler > to enable/force 64bit compiling)... [...] I doubt setting gcc-Flags make sense, if this is not a flag, that the ./configure-script inthe sources-directory accepts. I hope there is such an 64-Bit-option in the configure-script, if not, I think such flags could yield problems. > > I.e. no ocaml bug. > At least theconfigure-script did not find out that the machine is a 64-Bit's machine. So at least the config-script could be changed. (Or there is an 64-Bit-option, which I didn't checked, because I thought, it will find it out by itself. Ciao, Oliver > Maybe have a look at (gcc: gcc -dumpspecs which should among many > other things also tell you the default build/compile options... > E.g. on my sparc64, gcc tells me ... > > *cpp_arch: > %{m32:%(cpp_arch32)} %{m64:%(cpp_arch64)} %{!m32:%{!m64:%(cpp_arch_default)}} > > (read as: passed m32? select cpp_arch32. passed m64? select cpp_arch64. > passed neither m32 nor m64 ? select cpp_arch_default.) > > ..and.. > > *cpp_arch32: > > > *cpp_arch64: > -D__arch64__ > > *cpp_arch_default: > -D__arch64__ > > > ) > > Regards, > > -Martin