From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB73BC69 for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2006 06:19:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from pih-relay06.plus.net (pih-relay06.plus.net [212.159.14.133]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kA95JUOo028930 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2006 06:19:31 +0100 Received: from [80.229.56.224] (helo=[10.0.0.5]) by pih-relay06.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1Gi2K2-0002lW-Gv for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Thu, 09 Nov 2006 05:19:30 +0000 From: Jon Harrop Organization: Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] parameterized pattern Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 05:18:19 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <454FA5F8.5030106@hq.idt.net> <4a708d20611081555i1f860911rfb7a29d31a34ce7a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4a708d20611081555i1f860911rfb7a29d31a34ce7a@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611090518.19483.jon@ffconsultancy.com> X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 4552BA62.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; lukasz:01 ad-hoc:01 polymorphism:01 g'caml:01 u-tokyo:01 furuse:01 gcaml:01 g'caml:01 node:01 1278:01 ocaml:01 gcaml:01 ocaml:01 frog:98 cvs:01 On Wednesday 08 November 2006 23:55, Lukasz Stafiniak wrote: > You can do this kind of ad-hoc polymorphism with with G'Caml: > > http://web.yl.is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~furuse/gcaml/ > > BTW, I think that G'Caml deserves more attention on this list (see > http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/1278). (I've even thought that it > is still a patch to OCaml 2.0, but it seems to be up-to-date now.) I am certainly interested in GCaml but: . Where do you get it from (the CVS doesn't seem to have it)? . How fast is it? . Does it support native code? . What version of OCaml is it based upon? -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. Objective CAML for Scientists http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists