From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67BF4BC0B for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2006 02:31:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from chokecherry.srv.cs.cmu.edu (CHOKECHERRY.SRV.CS.CMU.EDU [128.2.185.41]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kB91VsVs010645 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 9 Dec 2006 02:31:55 +0100 Received: from stratocaster.home (c-24-3-144-139.hsd1.mn.comcast.net [24.3.144.139]) (authenticated bits=0) by chokecherry.srv.cs.cmu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kB91VrvR003673 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 8 Dec 2006 20:31:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from ecc by stratocaster.home with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Gsr3s-0000zX-77; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 20:31:32 -0500 Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 20:31:32 -0500 To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr, caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] A Question About Types and Inlining Message-ID: <20061209013132.GA3749@localhost> Mail-Followup-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr, caml-list@inria.fr References: <4579F1A4.6080606@ichips.intel.com> <20061209005506.GD3642@localhost> <457A0E60.6080204@philippewang.info> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <457A0E60.6080204@philippewang.info> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: Eric Cooper X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 457A120A.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; inlining:01 0100,:01 unboxing:01 unboxing:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 types:03 dec:05 boxing:08 boxing:08 philippe:11 question:12 should:13 but:14 some:14 On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 02:16:16AM +0100, Philippe Wang wrote: > I don't get it... Can you tell how adding some boxing/unboxing matter > can help having better performance ? You're right, I completely forgot about the boxing and unboxing, which will hurt performance. The exposed representation should still allow some more optimizations, but I don't know whether it will be enough for a net gain. -- Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u