From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80E34BC63 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 00:20:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from pih-relay04.plus.net (pih-relay04.plus.net [212.159.14.131]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0ENKrKO032675 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 00:20:54 +0100 Received: from [80.229.56.224] (helo=[10.0.0.5]) by pih-relay04.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1H6Eeh-0005OQ-8Q for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Sun, 14 Jan 2007 23:20:51 +0000 From: Jon Harrop Organization: Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Ocaml compiler features Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 20:49:56 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <45A87011.8080203@gmail.com> <45AA6966.8010602@gmail.com> <20070114185131.GB26213@snarc.org> In-Reply-To: <20070114185131.GB26213@snarc.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701142049.56449.jon@ffconsultancy.com> X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 45AABAD5.002 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 compiler:01 lacks:01 syntax:01 ocaml:01 stdlib:01 ocaml's:01 stdlib:01 frog:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 incompatible:01 caml:02 objective:02 seems:03 On Sunday 14 January 2007 18:51, Vincent Hanquez wrote: > At the moment, every one seems to have their own standard libraries to > extends the deficiency/problems/lacks of the common one, and also a bunch a > syntax extensions, that are also incompatible/redundant with each other for > most of them. I've been considering commercialising the replacement OCaml stdlib that I developed. Are you still using it? Would anyone else be interested? Lots can be done to improve upon the reliability and performance of OCaml's stdlib... -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. Objective CAML for Scientists http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists