From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4102ABC0B for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 00:38:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp3-g19.free.fr (smtp3-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.29]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0ENcaIL004336 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 00:38:37 +0100 Received: from localhost (kerneis.info [82.224.215.18]) by smtp3-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF46A49F32 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 00:38:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=gabriel) by localhost with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H6Evn-0002b7-9R for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 00:38:31 +0100 Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 00:38:23 +0100 From: Gabriel Kerneis To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Ocaml compiler features Message-ID: <20070115003823.7cd377c8@localhost> In-Reply-To: <200701142049.57959.jon@ffconsultancy.com> References: <45A87011.8080203@gmail.com> <200701141823.32855.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <20070114184148.GA26213@snarc.org> <200701142049.57959.jon@ffconsultancy.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_aRe+IPaYkGuO95H8nRs3Y9U; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 45AABEFC.002 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 compiler:01 haskell:01 overloading:01 optimise:01 ocaml:01 nrs:98 nrs:98 u--:98 caml-list:01 simplify:01 gnu:03 sentence:04 pgp:05 pgp:05 --Sig_aRe+IPaYkGuO95H8nRs3Y9U Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le Sun, 14 Jan 2007 20:49:57 +0000, Jon Harrop a =E9crit : > Playing with Haskell and F# has opened my eyes a bit. F#'s operator=20 > overloading and active patterns will make my code much nicer. Being > lazier can simplify things until you have to optimise, in which case > it suddenly becomes really complicated and error prone. What do you mean exactly in this last sentence ? I agree OCaml should evolve but what kind of "laziness" are you referring to ? Sincerely, --=20 Gabriel Kerneis --Sig_aRe+IPaYkGuO95H8nRs3Y9U Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFqr726a2JmXQu5bYRAplHAKCCdGl4skY7ep1K4LQAi39CjitaPwCg0oj7 seGdh78zA6zelQEsDtrXwvo= =k2hl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_aRe+IPaYkGuO95H8nRs3Y9U--