From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78591BC0C for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:08:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from hades.snarc.org (hades.snarc.org [212.85.152.11]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0G98ih3028116 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:08:45 +0100 Received: by hades.snarc.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A96291B481; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:08:03 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:08:03 +0100 To: Hendrik Tews Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr, Xavier Leroy Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Ocaml compiler features Message-ID: <20070116090803.GB14494@snarc.org> References: <45A87011.8080203@gmail.com> <20070115103556.GB12311@furbychan.cocan.org> <20070115142434.GA1753@snarc.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Warning: Email may contain unsmilyfied humor and/or satire. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: tab@snarc.org (Vincent Hanquez) X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 45AC961C.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 compiler:01 0100,:01 hendrik:01 tews:01 caml's:01 bug:01 ocaml:01 backtrace:01 pray:98 cvs:01 wrote:01 exception:01 writes:01 caml-list:01 On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 09:45:26AM +0100, Hendrik Tews wrote: > tab@snarc.org (Vincent Hanquez) writes: > > Xavier, if somebody does a patch to do that or some other useful feature, > would that be considered for entering CAML's CVS ? > (i.e. what are the rules for accepting a patch ?) > > Last time this question came up the answer was submit the patch > as feature wish to the bug tracking system and pray. See > > http://caml.inria.fr/pub/ml-archives/caml-list/2001/10/4bad397017270c62b70852840f37ad61.en.html > > But perhaps the position of the Ocaml team has changed? Well, seeing that the very useful native exception backtrace patch has been sitting idle (acknowledged) for more than a year, I think that's not working it out too well :\ Seeing the number of people monitoring the issue, I think lots of people are waiting it. I'm not saying the patch is perfect, but at least if somebody in the ocaml team would say something about it, we could improve it. http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=3885 -- Vincent Hanquez