From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from discorde.inria.fr (discorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.38]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 507EDBC69 for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 13:12:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from ptb-relay02.plus.net (ptb-relay02.plus.net [212.159.14.213]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l19CCo0H000752 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 13:12:51 +0100 Received: from [80.229.56.224] (helo=[10.0.0.5]) by ptb-relay02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1HFUcP-0000qU-NP for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 12:12:45 +0000 From: Jon Harrop Organization: Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Multiplication of matrix in C and OCaml Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 12:05:57 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <45CAF3E2.7020807@univ-paris12.fr> <20070209.115842.106265091.garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200702091205.57852.jon@ffconsultancy.com> X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 45CC6542.002 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 ocaml:01 frog:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 proportional:05 quite:07 complexity:08 certainly:09 products:86 ltd:86 inaccurate:13 case:13 www:84 friday:17 On Friday 09 February 2007 09:06, ls-ocaml-developer-2006@m-e-leypold.de wrote: > t(n) = C + K*n If you're assuming that the time taken will be proportional to complexity then that is almost certainly quite inaccurate in this case due to cache effects. -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. OCaml for Scientists http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists